Quantum Mechanics in Everyday Language
In our everyday world, objects behave in predictable ways. A ball sits in one place at a time and if you throw it at a wall, it bounces back from the same side every time. This is the world described by classical mechanics.
Quantum mechanics describes a very different world; the world of atoms and subatomic particles. Here, objects don’t have a single definite position. Instead, they exist in terms of probabilities. A particle might have a chance of being in one place, another chance of being somewhere else, and so on.
If we tried to imagine this using the tennis‑ball example, the “quantum ball” wouldn’t always bounce back from the same side of the wall. Instead, it would have a probability of appearing on the front, the back, or even the side of the wall. It’s not that the ball chooses a path. It’s that quantum objects behave according to probability rather than certainty.
How Quantum Computing Emerged
Quantum computing grew out of the early 20th‑century revolution in physics. Max Planck first proposed that energy comes in tiny packets called quanta, and scientists like Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, and Schrödinger built the foundations of quantum theory.
The idea of using quantum physics for computation came much later. In 1981, Richard Feynman pointed out that quantum systems are incredibly hard for classical computers to simulate. However, a quantum computer could do it naturally. This insight sparked the field of quantum computation.
A few key milestones followed:
These breakthroughs showed that quantum computers could solve certain problems far more efficiently than classical machines.
What Quantum Physics Actually Describes
Quantum physics studies how energy and matter behave at the smallest scales. Atoms, electrons, photons, and other tiny particles. One of its most important discoveries is that energy is quantised. Instead of changing smoothly, energy comes in fixed amounts called quanta.
This idea explains many phenomena:
Electrons and Energy Levels
Inside an atom, electrons don’t orbit the nucleus like planets around the sun. Instead, they occupy defined orbitals, each with a specific energy. An electron can only exist in these allowed levels; never in between.
This precise, quantised behaviour is one of the clearest examples of how the quantum world differs from the everyday world we’re used to.

physical qubits may be required to build a fault-tolerant quantum computer capable of outperforming classical machines.
speed-up is theoretically possible for certain problems using quantum algorithms like Grover’s over classical search methods.
seconds was all it took for Google’s Sycamore quantum processor to solve a problem that would take a supercomputer 10,000 years.
qubits is often cited as the threshold where quantum computers can outperform classical supercomputers in certain tasks (quantum supremacy).
Jeremy Green developer of Q-SLICE and QUANTA as part of his PhD in computer science. Is also a skilled and experienced security professional with more than 20 certifications across platform, security and DevSecOps including CISSP, CISM, CEH, ECDE and CHFI. He is also an official instructor for ISACA and EC Council and the author of Information Security Management Principles, fourth edition and Security Architecture A practical guide to designing proactive and resilient cyber protection published by BCS.

Author
Jeremy is also the author of BCS Information Security Management Principles Fourth Edition and Security Architecture: A practical guide to designing proactive and resilient cyber protection.

Instructor
Jeremy is an instructor for CompTIA, ISC2, ISACA and EC Council with twenty certifications. He also teachers Ethical Hacking and Digital Forensics on a Foundation Degree and holds a Cert Ed and QTLS.

Security Architect
Jeremy is a security architect supporting the security design and implementation of a large project for Leidos. Undertaking threat modelling, design assessment and stakeholder engagement.
Many organisations will be slow to recognise or respond to the threat posed by quantum computing, particularly in relation to its potential to break classical cryptographic systems. Some of this is due to quantum computing still being widely perceived as an abstract, long-term concern rather than an immediate operational risk.